Media Representations of SMEs in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: A Comparative Analysis

Authors

  • Ainur Kenzhetayeva Bluefield State University, Bluefield, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68081/svd03t98

Keywords:

small and medium-sized enterprise, media framing, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, state-business relations, economic development, public discourse

Abstract

This article examines how online newspapers represented small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan between 2020 and 2023. It investigates the economic and social roles attributed to SMEs, the visibility given to different actors, and the relationships between private enterprises and the state. The study employs comparative qualitative content and framing analysis of 187 newspaper articles, comprising 113 articles concerning Kazakhstan and 74 concerning Uzbekistan. Each article was assigned one primary content category and dominant codes covering SME roles, actor visibility, state-SME relationship, policy objectives, responsibility attribution, and temporal context. The findings reveal a state-centered representation of SME development in both countries. Government officials and agencies received greater visibility than entrepreneurs, while regulation and government assistance were more prominent than market autonomy. According to Kazakhstan’s coverage, SMEs were more frequently portrayed as vulnerable and affected by regulatory, financial, logistical, and external pressures. Uzbek coverage placed greater emphasis on government support programs and representation of SMEs as recipients of assistance within economic reform. The study concludes that newspaper coverage in both countries positioned SMEs as economically important actors, but still closely connected to government. The analysis contributes to research on the public role of SMEs in Central Asia by demonstrating how media discourse is constructed within different national and temporal contexts.

Author Biography

  • Ainur Kenzhetayeva, Bluefield State University, Bluefield, USA

    Ainur Kenzhetayeva, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Social Science at Bluefield State University, United States. Her research interests include comparative political economy, entrepreneurship and small and medium-sized enterprises, economic development, and post-Soviet Central Asia. Her research examines the institutional and structural conditions affecting private-sector development, state-business relations, and economic transformation in transition economies. Her current work also explores media representations of entrepreneurship and the role of SMEs in economic development and public policy in Central Asia. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-9936. E-mail: akenzhetayeva@bluefieldstate.edu.

     

References

Absattar, A., Mambetova, M., & Zhubay, O. (2022). The potential of emotive language to influence the understanding of textual information in media coverage. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, Article 222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01232-2

Ayyagari, M., Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2007). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9002-5

Bach, P., & Swartz, L. (2022). Making money public: The journalistic construction of the Paycheck Protection Program. International Journal of Communication, 16, 3780–3800. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18669

Barnes, A. (2006). Owning Russia: The struggle over factories, farms, and power. Cornell University Press.

Bhalla, A. S., & Sutken, C. (2023). Supply chain finance in Central Asia and the Caucasus (ADB Briefs). Asian Development Bank. https://doi.org/10.22617/BRF230230-2

Blanchard, O. (1997). The economics of post-communist transition. Clarendon Press.

Brezinski, H., & Fritsch, M. (Eds.). (1996). The economic impact of new firms in post-socialist economies. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Havrylyshyn, O. (2020). Present at the transition: An inside look at the role of history, politics, and personalities in post-communist countries. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108553834

Khalmurzaev, N. A. (2000). Small and medium-sized enterprises in the transition economy of Uzbekistan: Conditions and perspectives. Central Asian Survey, 19(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930050079363

Mussa, N., Myssayeva, K., & Brown, M. (2025). Framing conflict in Kazakhstan: A comparative analysis of Kazakh, Russian, and U.K. news outlets. Media Asia, 52(2), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2024.2361539

Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2011). Transition economies: Political economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Wiley.

Ngai, C. S. B., Yao, L., & Singh, R. G. (2022). A comparative analysis of the U.S. and China’s mainstream news media framing of coping strategies and emotions in the reporting of COVID-19 outbreak on social media. Discourse & Communication, 16(5), 572–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813221099191

North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678

OECD. (2023a). Insights on the business climate in Kazakhstan. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bd780306-en

OECD. (2023b). Insights on the business climate in Uzbekistan. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/317ce52e-en

OECD. (2024). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2024: An OECD scoreboard. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fa521246-en

Özcan, G. B. (2010). Building states and markets: Enterprise development in Central Asia. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-29695-4

Pyagay, A., Tatikova, A., & Medeni, T. (2025). Contradictions and patterns of eco-innovative strategies of SMEs in Central Asian countries: Ambivalent dynamics of Kazakhstan. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00455-8

Snihur, Y., Thomas, L. D. W., Garud, R., & Phillips, N. (2022). Entrepreneurial framing: A literature review and future research directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 578–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211000336

Svejnar, J. (2002). Transition economies: Performance and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330027058

Syzdykova, A., & Azretbergenova, G. (2025). Analysis of the impact of SMEs’ production output on Kazakhstan’s economic growth using the ARDL method. Economies, 13(2), Article 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13020038

Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship – Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x

Wirz, C. D., Shao, A., Bao, L., Howell, E. L., Monroe, H., & Chen, K. (2022). Media systems and attention cycles: Volume and topics of news coverage on COVID-19 in the United States and China. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99(4), 1048–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211049455

Downloads

Published

2026-08-26

How to Cite

Kenzhetayeva, A. (2026). Media Representations of SMEs in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Governance, Economics, and International Affairs, 1(1), 122-142. https://doi.org/10.68081/svd03t98